Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Gulick's avatar

What's ironic (?) is that Cuomo's amalgam of rich and poor voters resembles what was once characterized as the limousine liberal coalition, even though Cuomo's politics are a DLC style rebuke of limousine liberalism, whereas Mamdani's economically struggling middle income voters in a way fit the profile of a populism that is often coded as right-leaning... even though ZM is unapologetically pro Palestinian, eagerly embraced LBGQTIA endorsement, held the line on hiring more cops, etc. The difference in NYC is a decided majority of residents are renters and there's a strong age skew to this as well.

Expand full comment
John Gulick's avatar

The key brand differentiation between Cuomo and Adams, despite both being candidates of real estate and the NYPD and the (ultra) orthodox Jewish bloc, is that with centrist Dems the former can plausibly present himself as a Trump #resister—despite the reality that his campaign stoked Islamophobic hysteria, and his infamous history as a GOP collaborator in Albany—whereas Adams is an incorrigibly corrupted asset. Given the present balance of forces and options, fluid and subject to change, the anti-Mamdanis' best shot is for Sliwa to drop out and for Adams to pick up the MAGA vote while Cuomo retains his primary electorate and peels off affluent liberal voters made to worry about Mamdani's "inexperience" and the "impracticality" of his otherwise laudable policy ideas under conditions of federal fiscal sabotage and threatened capital flight. And that's precisely where Comptroller Lander and his supporters could rescue Mamdani.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts