Despite this article and everything else I've read, I continue to fail to understand the professional left's coalescing around Brannan. On the issues themselves, Levine has arguably been more progressive (and let's be real: on Israel-Palestine, they would take the exact same actions, rhetoric aside), plus Brannan has some stink around his interactions with lobbyists and the casino. I don't get it.
Despite this article and everything else I've read, I continue to fail to understand the professional left's coalescing around Brannan. On the issues themselves, Levine has arguably been more progressive (and let's be real: on Israel-Palestine, they would take the exact same actions, rhetoric aside), plus Brannan has some stink around his interactions with lobbyists and the casino. I don't get it.
Great reason to root against Brannan: if he loses we'll get a new Caninus album